Page 79: Giganotosaurus, an Early Cretaceous carcarodontosaurid, had a head that resembles Allosaurus. Yet, the two creationists made it as if it has a head a lot like a Tyrannosaurus Rex. Apparently they must have used Stinktooth, the Giganotosaurus with a Tyrannosaurus-like head from James Gurney's fantasy book Dinotopia: The World Beneath as a model for this illustration.
Page 80: Ah, a fairy tale. Pure make believe creationists falsely call true and factual is displayed in the next pages ahead, including this scene on page 80 showing Adam and Eve tending to a wrongly sized Montanoceratops, a leptoceratopid which was much smaller than what is shown on the page in real life. The two creationists wrongly made it as if it was the exact size and shape of Triceratops while in reality Montanoceratops grew to be about 6 feet long and 3 feet tall which is about the size of a 6 year old child.
The only tamed dinosaur Adam and Eve ever handled was a bird. Otherwise there were no dinosaurs for Adam and Eve to tame. The two imaginative creationists speculate that it was possible for dinosaurs to be tame because according to the Bible, God gave Adam and Eve dominion over all animal life and as a result, "All kinds of animals, birds, reptiles and creatures of the sea are being tamed and have been tamed by man." (James 3:7 NIV) Never mind that there are some animals out there that mankind cannot control and tame no matter what. The Apostle James only wrote the verse, which the two creationists took out of context, in his letter to his Christian brothers and sisters to explain the terrible tongue, the only thing mankind cannot control other than certain animals James apparently is unaware of that mankind can never tame and control no matter how hard he tries. Lions, elephants, and chimpanzees are among the animals man thinks he can control, but his control over them is very limited due to the animals' strong, unpredictable, aggressive nature. One minute the animal seems to be tamed as creationists would like for their gullible followers to believe, the next minute the man who attempted to handle the beasts of the earth wishes he should've never handled these animals to begin with as they lunge forward and maul him to pieces. And then there are animals that mankind cannot and can never control no matter what. One of such animals is a worm that can burrow itself inside an eye of a child to survive. This worm is what Sir David Attenborough thinks of when he's told to give God the credit for "all these wonderful things" God gave mankind dominion over and to be good stewards of.
"The idea that that when people say why don't you give God the credit for all these wonderful things. When people say that ah they nearly always want to ah as take the example of butterflies or hummingbirds or orchids or something, lovely. Um and I'm or I write back because they write to me on ah on this and say yes well it's all very well ah but of course um I think of a little boy sitting on a bank of the river in West Africa with a worm that's boring through his eyeball and which will certainly turn him blind ah within a few years. Now this God that you so-, that created every single species, he must presumably have created that worm. Now are you telling me that this is a Christian God who um has compassion and mercy for every individual one of us and that he did it he did it did it deliberately put a, in, ah make a worm and put it in the eye of this child. I, ah, this worm can't exist anywhere else. Well I don't find that compatible with the notion of a of there being a a merciful creator, God. If you're a creationist do you actually believe that this worm together with tape worms and everything else actually were created at the same time as Adam and that God said OK I'll make Adam and I'll give him, I'll kick him out with every, every one of these little animal parasites. Did he do that? And if he didn't do that, then what had happened presumably is that these worms related to other worms in the Garden of Eden and eventually moved into the … in which case they then changed and so they couldn't live anywhere else as the condition is now. They've evolved. Dear me, there's a rude word."
Page 81: When creationists tell you to not to be deceived by the notion of sharp teeth indicating meat-eater because there are animals that are otherwise omnivorous such as the spider monkey (it occasionally eat insects), giant panda (it occasionally eats takin, a kind of Chinese deer), and the gorilla (it occasionally ingest small insects) who use their sharp teeth to eat only plants and fruit (never mind their sharp teeth being called canines which are used to intimidate and fight back when attacked, and that these animals have blunt-style biting and chewing teeth to mash up plant food to a pulp), counter them with examples of animals like the mosasaur Globidens, Placodus, rats, mice, antelope like the duiker, and humans, too, having only dull, blunt teeth supposedly used for eating only plants, yet are only used to crush shellfish, gobble up live insects, worms and other small animals, and tear away raw flesh from bone.
Page 82: In real life, many dromaeosaurs have the ability to climb trees, using their clawed grasping hands and feet to get a better grip on the trunk and branches of the tree. They climb trees to escape being eaten by larger dinosaurs and to pounce on their prey. None of their weapons are made to cut up fruits and vegetables which all dromaeosaurs cannot stomach in real life due to their digestive system being made for only meat consumption, not for digesting plants which contains tough fibrous materials that can only be broken down by a special digestive system (like cows and elephants have) that's made to only cope with plants. Deinonychus was a well known dromaeosaur who used its speed and agility to chase down fast moving prey. It was a full-fledged carnivorous maniraptorian bird-like dinosaur capable of traveling in packs to take down large prey twice its size with its sharp claws and sharp, curvy teeth perfect for cutting and tearing up flesh from the victim's body.
Only an idiot will believe this ludicrous imaginary tale all made up by the Sellenburgers who claimed ludicrously that Deinonychus used its huge sickle claws God gave to quickly climb up trees to get at the fruit growing at the top (left) and used its sharp teeth to cut up fruits and vegetables; its teeth, let alone its digestive system, cannot digest such food.
Page 83-84: Here's where a child can build a anatomically incorrect, naked skinned Deinonychus with an alligator-style belly and flexable tail jumping jack toy.
Page 85: Compsognathus is shown here in comparison with a chicken. This dinosaur is claimed to have only two fingers on each hand. It was once thought that Compsognathus had only two fingers on each hand. But it is now confirmed that Compsognathus actually had three fingers on each hand just like other Compsognathids. The famous fossil of Compsognathus unearthed in Germany in the 1850s is now shown to be a juvenile version of a much larger specimen that was unearthed over a hundred years later in France. The German specimen seem to show the poorly preserved hand to have just two fingers which leads Paleontologists to conclude that this is the exact finger arrangement the dinosaur has. This is debunked when the much larger French specimen unearthed on 1972 clearly show that Compsognathus actually has three fingers on each hand, not two.
Page 86: Here's an anatomically incorrect Brachiosaurus, the pseudo-dragon with a longer tail, a hole on top of the snout, and limbs about the same size shown in comparison with an elephant.
Continuing debunking Sellenburgers' idiocy next issue.